Saturday, May 3, 2008

The Real War on Terror that Obama Doesn't Seem to Understand, or Does He?

In an earlier blog (Obama Calls For Talk With Iran?) I had written about Obama’s apparent lack of knowledge of foreign affairs and especially those concerning the ME. I continued that same line of thought in light of Jimmy, “the useful idiot” Carter’s foray into the ME situation with the terrorist group Hamas and it’s relationship with Israel. We know from history that Mr. Carter didn’t have a clue about the history of terrorism in the ME and his bumbling of the Iranian Hostage Situation.

It seems that there is an e-mail circulating that is credited to Dr. Vernon Chong, retired Major General and head of Wofford Hall Hospital at Lackland AFB. However the entire piece is not the writing of Dr. Chong as I recently discovered. He received it as an e-mail and then wrote to a friend and forward it to them. In doing so the entire article somehow was attributed to Dr. Chong. While he does not take credit for the article he does indeed agree with it. In my studies on ME affairs I found nothing inaccurate about the article and thus will include it here for your reading. I urge you to read it thoroughly and if you do not get it the first time then re-read the article until you do. This is not a game that is being played out in the ME but a serious threat to the entire world. While these more radical groups may only comprise a small percentage of the Muslim population, which is approximately 25% of the world population and growing, they are indeed intent in carrying out their dream of Islamic domination in the world. Understand they do not intend to do so through direct confrontation with the world powers for they understand that they could not win such but they do understand the psychological effect of terrorism. They also understand the use of population growth, multiculturalism and how to use the political correct thought of host countries in order to make demands , small they may seem, but growing until they are in control. We can see this already occurring in Europe, especially France and now the push is on in England. Some of you have read that the Muslim religious leaders are calling for the right to broadcast the “call to prayer” over loudspeakers over the entire city of London. Folks that is just the beginning. Recently in this country the Muslims demanded that separate facilities be made available to Muslim female students at Harvard University in order to not offend these young ladies as they participated in exercise. Unfortunately the politically correct inclined administration at Harvard granted this request. This is what I referred to as just one small step at a time until total control is gained. So I urge you to read the contents of this article keeping in mind that while not written by Dr. Chong it is indeed accurate.

Muslim terrorists and the U.S.A. :
A different spin on the war in Iraq: This WAR is REAL



To get out of a difficulty, one usually must go through it. Our country is now facing the most serious threat to its existence, as we know it, that we have faced in your lifetime and mine (which includes WWII).


The deadly seriousness is greatly compounded by the fact that there are very few of us who think we can possibly lose this war and even fewer who realize what losing really means.


First, let's examine a few basics:


1 When did the threat to us start?


Many will say
September 11, 2001. The answer, as far as the United States is concerned, is 1979, 22 years prior to September 2001, with the following attacks on us:
* Iran Embassy Hostages, 1979;
* Beirut , Lebanon Embassy 1983;
*
Beirut, Lebanon Marine Barracks 1983;
* Lockerbie ,
ScotlandPan-Am flight to New York 1988;
* FirstNew YorkWorld Trade Center attack 1993;
* Dhahran , Saudi Arabia Khobar Towers Military complex 1996;
* Nairobi , Kenya USEmbassy 1998;
* Dares Salaam , Tanzania US Embassy 1998;
* Aden , Yemen USS Cole 2000;
* New York World Trade Center 2001;
* Pentagon 2001.


(Note: during the period from 1981 to 2001 there were 7,581 terrorist attacks worldwide.)


2 Why were we attacked?


Envy of our position, our success, and our freedoms. The attacks happened during the administrations of Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton and Bush 2. We cannot fault either the Republicans or Democrats, as there were no provocations by any of the presidents or their immediate predecessor, President Ford.


3 Who were the attackers?


In each case, the attacks on the US were carried out by Muslims.


4 What is the Muslim population of the World?


25%.


5 Isn't the Muslim Religion peaceful?


Hopefully, but that is really not material. There is no doubt that the predominately Christian population of Germany was peaceful, but under the dictatorial leadership of Hitler (who was also Christian), that made no difference. You either went along with the administration or you were eliminated. There were 5 to 6 million Christians killed by the Nazis for political reasons (including
7,000 Polish priests).


(see
http://www.Nazis.testimony.co.uk/7-a.htm

Thus, almost the same number of Christians were killed by the Nazis as the six million holocaust Jews who were killed by them, and we seldom hear of anything other than the Jewish atrocities. Although Hitler kept the world focused on the Jews, he had no hesitancy in killing anyone who got in the way of his extermination of the Jews or of taking over the world - German, Christian, or any others.


Same with the Muslim terrorists. They focus the world on the US , but kill all in the way -- their own people or the Spanish, British, French or anyone else. The point here is that, just like the peaceful Germans were of no protection to anyone from the Nazis, no matter how many peaceful Muslims there may be, they are no protection for us from the terrorist Muslim leaders and what they are fanatically bent on doing -- by their own pronouncements
-- killing all of us "infidels." I don't blame the peaceful Muslims. What would you do if the choice was to remain silent or be killed?


6 So who are we at war with?


There is no way we can honestly respond that it is anyone other than the Muslim terrorists. Trying to be politically correct and avoid verbalizing this conclusion can well be fatal. There is no way to win if you don't clearly recognize and articulate who you are fighting.


So with that background, now to the two major questions:

1 Can we lose this war?


2 What does losing really mean?


If we are to win, we must clearly answer these two pivotal questions:


We can definitely lose this war and, as anomalous as it may sound, the major reason we can lose is that so many of us simply do not fathom the answer to the second question - What does losing mean?


It would appear that a great many of us think that losing the war means hanging our heads, bringing the troops home, and going on about our business, like post-Vietnam. This is as far from the truth as one can get.


What losing really means is:


We would no longer be the premier country in the world. The attacks will not subside, but, rather, will steadily increase. Remember, they want us dead, not just quiet. If they had just wanted us quiet, they would not have produced an increasing series of attacks against us over the past 18 years. The plan was, clearly, for terrorists to attack us until we were neutered and submissive to them.


We would, of course, have no future support from other nations, for fear of reprisals and for the reason that they would see; we are impotent and cannot help them..


They will pick off the other non-Muslim nations, one at a time. It will be increasingly easier for them. They already hold Spain hostage. It doesn't matter whether it was right or wrong for Spain to withdraw its troops from Iraq . Spain did it because the Muslim terrorists bombed their train and told them to withdraw the troops. Anything else they want Spain to do will be done. Spain is finished.


The next will probably be France . Our one hope with France is that they might see the light and realize that if we don't win, they are finished, too, in that they can't resist the Muslim terrorists without us. However, it may already be too late for France . France is already 20% Muslim and fading fast.


Without our support, Great Britain will go, also. Recently, I read that there are more mosques in England than churches.


If we lose the war, our production, income, exports, and way of life will all vanish as we know it. After losing, who would trade or deal with us if they were threatened by the Muslims? If we can't stop the Muslim terrorists, how could anyone else?


The radical Muslims fully know what is riding on this war, and therefore are completely committed to winning, at any cost. We'd better know it, too, and be likewise committed to winning at any cost.


Why do I go on at such lengths about the results of losing? Simple. Until we recognize the costs of losing, we cannot unite and really put 100% of our thoughts and efforts into winning. And it is going to take that 100% effort to win.


So, how can we lose the war?


Again, the answer is simple. We can lose the war by "imploding." That is, defeating ourselves by refusing to recognize the enemy and their purpose and failing to dig in and lend full support to the war effort. If we are united, there is no way that we can lose. If we continue to be divided, there is no way that we can win.


Let me give you a few examples of how we simply don't comprehend the life and death seriousness of this situation:


President Bush selects Norman Mineta as Secretary of Transportation. Although all of the terrorist attacks were committed by Muslim men between 17 and 40 years of age, Secretary Mineta refuses to allow profiling. Does that sound like we are taking this thing seriously? This is war! For the duration, we are going to have to give up some of the civil rights to which we have become accustomed. We had better be prepared to lose some of our civil rights temporarily or we will most certainly lose all of them permanently.


And don't worry that it is a slippery slope. We gave up plenty of civil rights during WWII, and immediately restored them after the victory ... and, in fact, added many more since that time.


Do I blame President Bush or President Clinton before him?


No, I blame us for blithely assuming we can maintain all of our Political Correctness and all of our civil rights during this conflict and have a clean, lawful, honorable war. None of those words apply to war. Get them out of your head.


Some have gone so far in their criticism of the war and/or the Administration that it almost seems they would literally like to see us lose.


I think some actually do. I hasten to add that this isn't because they are disloyal. It is because they just don't recognize what losing means. Nevertheless, that conduct gives the impression to the enemy that we are divided and weakening. It concerns our friends and it does great damage to our cause.


Of more recent vintage, the uproar fueled by the politicians and media regarding the treatment of some prisoners of war perhaps exemplifies best what I am saying. We have recently had an issue involving the treatment of a few Muslim prisoners of war, by a small group of our military police.. These are the type prisoners who just a few months ago were throwing their own people off buildings, cutting off their hands, cutting out their tongues, and otherwise murdering their own just for disagreeing with Saddam Hussein.


And, just a few years ago, these same type prisoners chemically killed 400,000 of their own people for the same reason. They are also the same type of enemy fighters who recently were burning Americans and dragging their charred corpses through the streets of
Iraq. And, still more recently, the same type of enemy that was and is providing videos to all news sources internationally of the beheading of American prisoners they held.

Compare this with some of our press and politicians, who for several days have thought and talked about nothing else but the "humiliating" of some Muslim prisoners -- not burning them, not dragging their charred corpses through the streets, not beheading them, but "humiliating" them.


Can they be for real?


The politicians and pundits have even talked of impeachment of the Secretary of Defense. If this doesn't show the complete lack of comprehension and understanding of the seriousness of the enemy we are fighting, the life and death struggle we are in, and the disastrous results of losing this war, nothing can.


To bring our country to a virtual political standstill over this prisoner issue makes us look like Nero playing his fiddle as Rome burned -- totally oblivious to what is going on in the real world. Neither we, nor any other country, can survive this internal strife. Again, I say, this does not mean that some of our politicians or media people are disloyal. It simply means that they are absolutely oblivious to the magnitude of the situation we are in and into which the Muslim terrorists have been pushing us for many years.


These people are a serious and dangerous liability to the war effort. We must take note of who they are and get them out of office. Remember, the Muslim terrorists stated goal is to kill all infidels. That translates into ALL non-Muslims -- not just in the United States , but throughout the world. We are the last bastion of defense.


We have been criticized for many years as being 'arrogant.' That charge is valid. We are arrogant in that we believe that we are so good, powerful, and smart that we can win the hearts and minds of all those who attack us, and that, with both hands tied behind our back, we can defeat anything bad in the world.
We can't!

If we don't recognize this, our nation, as we know it, will not survive, and no other free country in the world will survive if we are defeated.


And, finally, name any Muslim countries throughout the world that allow freedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, equal rights for anyone -- let alone everyone, equal status or any status for women, or that have been productive in one single way that contributes to the good of the world.


This has been a long way of saying that we must be united on this war or we will be equated in the history books to the self- inflicted fall of the Roman Empire . If, that is, the Muslim leaders will allow history books to be written or read.


If we don't win this war right now, keep a close eye on how the Muslims take over France in the next 5 years or less. They will continue to increase the Muslim population of France and continue to encroach, little by little, on the established French traditions.


The French will be fighting among themselves over what should or should not be done, which will continue to weaken them and keep them from any united resolve. Doesn't that sound eerily familiar?


Democracies don't have their freedoms taken away from them by some external military force. Instead, they give their freedoms away, politically correct piece by politically correct piece.


And they are giving those freedoms away to those who have shown, worldwide, that they abhor freedom and will not apply it to you or even to themselves, once they are in power.


Muslims have universally shown that when they have taken over, they then start brutally killing each other over who the few will be controlling the masses.


What is happening in Iraq is a good example. Will we ever stop hearing from the politically correct about the "peaceful Muslims?"


I close on a hopeful note by repeating what I said before:
If we are united, there is no way that we can lose.I hope now, after the election, the factions in our country will begin to focus on the critical situation we are in, and will unite to save our country. It is your future we are talking about. Do whatever you can to preserve it. I reiterate: our national election is under way.

After reading the above, we all must do this, not only for ourselves, but for our children, our grandchildren, our country, and our world. Whether Democrat or Republican, conservative or liberal ... and that includes the Politicians and media of our country and the free world.

4 comments:

Brenda Bowers said...

I posted this letter also. It is a good reminder that the war with Islam did not just start with 9/11 but has been on going for almost a century and is continuing to make more and more inroads in as you say little ways until they finally take over. I also keep bringing up the Washington Post article exposing the hate in the text books used in Muslim schools all over the world. It's kind of hard to refute direct quotes from text books for children in grades 1 thru 12 but some fools actually past this article researched and written by a WaPo reporter as being a ploy and filled with inaccuracies. I simply don't know how the words "hate all infidels" can be misinterpreted, do you? BB

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/19/AR2006051901769.html

Faultline USA said...

Yes I've received a copy of this e-mail as well - and it is very important to share. Thanks for posting it.

Ticker said...

I would ask those who wish to use the e-mail to please add the disclaimer, as I did, about Dr.Chong being the originator of the e-mail. While he agrees with the contents and did send it forward to other friends, he did not author the original. I believe that the credit supposedly belongs to an attorney who wrote down the thoughts to his young son. You may copy and paste my disclaimer if you wish or use the link to this blog post on your blog. Thank you, Ticker

WomanHonorThyself said...

great great overview!!