Monday, July 14, 2008

Rejoicing or Weeping and Gnashing of Teeth

Things aren’t looking so rosy for the Obamazombies! Looks like their empty suit Barry has sold out, after all his earlier speeches were “just words”. At least that is the way he seems to describe his opponents and those with whom HE disagrees with. Looks like “just words” is coming back to bite him in the butt. For the Obamazombies who think this is no real deal, check out this site:

another link from there is: .

I counted over 150 such sites linked to and there are more sites on other links ,which given the fact or supposed fact that Obama's run was fueled by the web, does not bode well for one whose support supposedly came from the internet.

Read it and rejoice if you feel Obama , the empty suit, is wrong for this country. Read it and weep if you are an Obamazombie.

I wonder how many of the Obamazombies, who believe that the WH is Obama’s, remember the 68 and 72 conventions and one Sen. George McGovern? I suggest they read some history. In 68,McGovern had the nomination pretty much sewed up after Robert Kennedy’s death and lost big time at the convention. He then lost the presidential bid in 72. The worst defeat experienced by the Democrats in recent history.

I also found this tibit while checking facts on McGovern and his losses:

In 1969, McGovern was named chairman of the Commission on Party Structure and Delegate Selection; due to the influence of former McCarthy and Kennedy supporters on the staff, the commission significantly reduced the role of party officials and insiders in the nomination process, increased the role of caucuses and primaries, and mandated quotas for proportional black, women, and youth delegate representation.

Does an of this sound familiar to the Obamazombies??? It should since the LSM and a few far left wingers in the Democrat Party have virtually done a repeat of McGovern . Anyone want to wager that the results will be the same? Taking a look at things right now with Obama’s ratings slipping almost daily and the opposition to him by Hillary backers and actual “thinking” old time Democrats, Obama’s chances are looming dimmer by the day.

Will the pacifist who suddenly switched from Hillary to Obama,due to her stance on Iraq, remain blinded by an empty suit who is long on words and short on substance remain in the Obamazombie camp or will they awaken from the “walking dead” slumber and see Obama for what he really is.



On July 3, Barack Obama revealed once and for all that he has run a fraudulent campaign in his attempt to secure the Democratic nomination for President. The foundation of Obama’s campaign had been his claim that he was the anti-war alternative in his opposition to Bush’s war in Iraq.

Now, in a North Dakota campaign event, Obama has declared that he will consult with the generals and “refine his position” on the Iraq war. The Washington Post headlined: “Obama May Consider Slowing Iraq Withdrawal.” But the real message is clear: Obama is moving rapidly away from his earlier 11-month or 16-month timetables for withdrawal and towards full support for endless war, conflict, violence, and bankruptcy in Iraq.

Samantha Power had confessed Obama’s doubletalk on Iraq months ago. The handwriting is now on the wall: Obama will soon go to Iraq, meet with General Petraeus, and then announce his Baghdad road conversion to a policy of open-ended military occupation, oblivious to the immense human costs.

Soon there will be no difference at all between Obama and McCain on the Iraq war, and the Democratic Party will have missed yet another historic opportunity to help the American people end Bush’s and Cheney’s failed Neo-Conservative policies. McCain is exploiting Obama’s radical shifts in position as examples that Obama has no principles, but only opportunism and expediency, and that his much-touted soaring words mean absolutely nothing.

We Democrats now have our last chance to reflect: do we really want to give our nomination to this little-known newcomer who solicited support as a peace advocate, but has now unmasked himself as being a candidate with positions closer to McCain on Iraq?


From the instant that he felt that the Democratic nomination was in his hands, Obama has moved relentlessly to the right in a breathtaking, stunning exhibition of cynicism, duplicity, and fraudulent campaigning. Everything he stood for has been thrown overboard, and Obama has broken his word — the commitment he made to his own core voters and donors.

Obama promised to stop Bush’s assault on the Constitution and civil liberties, and end illegal wiretapping. Now, Obama will vote for the Republican leaning compromise on the FISA bill, including immunity for the telecoms – something only yesterday he promised the Democrats who supported him he would filibuster.

Obama raised money from grassroots Democrats on the premise that their small donations would allow him to be free of the corrupting influence of big money, big business, and special interests, but he has now broken his promise by opting out of public financing for his fall campaign, junking the cause of political reform he claimed to champion.

In Ohio and Pennsylvania, Obama posed as a critic of free trade sellouts like NAFTA, CAFTA, and WTO, specifically telling voters that voting for Hillary Clinton would be voting to support NAFTA. Now Obama has told Fortune magazine that he is a great friend of free trade and the “market.”

Obama now openly supports the death penalty, more of Bush’s faith-based theocratic subsidies, and the “merit pay” assault on teachers. He wants to cut the corporate income tax, and he now opposes attempts to curb hand gun violence.

In a most glaring betrayal to his contract with the Democratic base, Obama’s current team of economic advisers suggests that he will soon come out for the partial privatization of Social Security, camouflaged as “entitlement reform.”

In short, Obama intends to betray not just his own basic commitments, but the historical foundations of the Democratic Party going back to Franklin D. Roosevelt. The modern Democratic Party was built on the New Deal Democrats, a party of shared responsibility, and a contract to be the voice and champion of working class Americans.

Obama’s “new coalition” dismantles the REAL Democratic Party and replaces it with an elite party of Neo-Liberals, stealing the mantle of FDR.

The next 100 or so days will tell the tale but my take on this is that Obama and the Obamazombies are in for a rude awakening in November.


Anonymous said...


I hope and pray that your prediction is correct.

I sense, however, that the true believers will just ignore his move to center and have a deep faith that he will , if elected , govern from the left. Where else do they have to go ?

Fred Gregory

Maggie M. Thornton said...

Obama talking about Bush's assault on the Constitution is really rich.

He plans to subvert the Constitution and give this country away to the U.N. Senate Bill 2433 is his avenue.

Maggie's Notebook

Ticker said...

Maggie, not only that but what about the 13th Amendment that did away with forced servitude, otherwise known to those in victimology 101 as slavery.

“There’s a weird irony at work when Sen. Barack Obama, the black presidential candidate who will allegedly scrub the stain of racism from the nation, vows to run afoul of the constitutional amendment that abolished slavery. For those who don’t remember, the 13th Amendment says: ‘Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime... shall exist within the United States.’ In Obama’s mind it must be a crime to be born or to attend college. In his speech on national service... at the University of Colorado, Obama promised that as president he would ‘set a goal for all American middle and high school students to perform 50 hours of service a year, and for all college students to perform 100 hours of service a year.’ He would see that these goals are met by, among other things, attaching strings to federal education dollars. If you don’t make kids report for duty, he’s essentially telling schools and college kids, you’ll lose money you can’t afford to lose. In short, he’ll make service compulsory by merely compelling schools to make it compulsory.

Ticker said...

Fred, read the links I provided. Many are planning a total revolt of Obama and will vote for anyone but Obama.