Friday, March 6, 2009


Remember the chant by the Democrats during the 2006 elections? Are you better off than you were six years ago? Well , I ask today, are you better off than you were two years ago? What happened to all the hope and change? Here is what I have found and the change doesn't offer much hope. You decide!


Is your home, or your market investment, or your retirement account worth more today than it was last November, when the election of BHO ushered in the era of "hope 'n' change"?

For some reason, both the housing and equity markets began declining after Democrats regained control of the Senate and House in 2006. Since Obama's election, the bottom has dropped out. We as Americans have not only lost income and jobs, but also some 35 percent of the value of our homes and market/retirement accounts.


What I'm looking at is not the day-to-day gyrations of the stock market but the long-term, uh, ability for the United States and the entire world economy, uh, to regain its footing. Uh, and, y-y-you know, the stock market is sort of like a tracking poll in politics. It bobs up and down day to day, uh, and if you spend all your time worrying about that, you're probably going to get long-term strategy wrong. ... What you're now seeing is profit and -- and earning ratios are -- are starting to, to get to the point where buying stocks is a potentially good deal if you've got a long-term perspective on it. Uhhh, I think that consumer confidence, as they see the American, uh, Recovery and Reinvestment Act taking root, uh, businesses are starting to see opportunities for investment, uh, and potential hiring." --Barack Obama

"The comparison to daily tracking polls is ... inapt. Whereas those polls serve only a predictive function, stock values (and dividends, which are also plummeting) do measure real wealth. Further, if a candidate's performance in tracking polls had been declining steadily for three months, surely it would be time to change strategy or drop out of the race. A 30% decline is a heck of a fit, and Wall Street hasn't had anything that can be called a start since before Obama's election. ... As for the so-called stimulus as confidence booster, suffice it to note that the Industrial Average closed at 7933 on Feb. 12, the day before Congress passed the bill. [Thursday] it closed at [6594], a decline of [17%] in ... three weeks." --The Wall Street Journal's James Taranto


According to the Associated Press, "The number of people who were late making their mortgage payments shot up 53 percent in the fourth quarter of 2008 from the same period in 2007." We're sure this is unrelated to Obama's plan, but we thought it was worth a mention.

Also noteworthy is that Obama failed to save 651,000 jobs in February, hampering his efforts to "save or create" 3.5 million jobs. The monthly loss was the worst since 1949. The economy has now lost 2.5 million jobs since Obama's election and 4.4 million since December 2007. The unemployment rate is 8.1 percent. So this is hope and change?

How Reassuring - NOT

Back in the Great Society era, Social Security was expanded to include Medicare. When the program was introduced, Americans were assured that it would not become a costly drain on the federal budget. But almost every year for the past 40, the cost of Medicare has increased at a faster rate than the cost of private insurance. The federal government now is responsible for 47 percent of all health care costs. The $634 billion promised by they Chief Occupier, to pay for his ambitious health care plan won't cover its estimated $1 trillion cost over the next decade. And as we have seen before with both Medicare and Medicaid, projected revenues and cost savings are viewed by federal bean counters with the rosiest-tinted glasses available.


Cap-and-trade is a bad idea

The Lieberman-Warner cap-and-trade approach to greenhouse gases makes us think derivatives. Analogous in more ways than one to the vaporous quality of financial derivatives, this new "market" depends on the underlying "value" of carbon and the ability to trade it as an "offset." One difference is that we already know this sort of program is an economic nightmare in Europe.

If undeterred by Europe's failure, our congressional best and brightest should note the impact as determined by a recent report by the Marshall Institute: The new regulations would be the equivalent of a permanent tax increase for the average American household, estimated to be $1,100 in 2008, rising to $1,437 by 2015, and $2,979 by 2050. Hundreds of thousands of jobs would be lost, while electricity and natural gas prices would increase by anywhere from five to 50 percent over the next five years. Gasoline could increase as much as 145 percent. So much for President Obama's promise of "a tax cut for 95 percent of working Americans." “There will be those who will be disappointed” Barrack Hussein Obama

In summary, Congress and the Obama administration have proposed a program that addresses an unproven climate change problem by implementing a program proven to bring higher energy costs, job losses, and is every bit the financial scam that many financial derivatives have proved to be. The "underlying asset" is nothing but a government-imposed regulatory scheme designed to enrich the traders, depress Western economies and promote the myth of man-made climate change.


After three "bailouts" for AIG since September totaling nearly $180 billion in squandered taxpayer funding, all the taxpayers have to show for their purchase is a company locked in a death spiral. So, naturally, the Federal Reserve is throwing more money at the problem. Now that the government owns 78 percent of AIG, there is no end in sight for the ever-declining insurer. On Monday, AIG reported a $61.7 billion fourth-quarter loss, all of which was incurred under the new federalized stewardship. And yet some still believe that the government can run anything when the truth is they can sure RUIN anything they touch.

Hat Tip Patriot PostUS


Mustang said...

I believe that not a single thoughtful citizen accepts this nonsense about hope and change. People with even an ounce of brains do clearly understand that the so-called hope was fraudulent, or at the very least based on false premises, and that the promised change leads us in a direction most people cannot abide. Since November, the stock market has dropped some 4,500 points. Since November, the unemployment rate has increased to 8.3 percent. Easily 47% of the American people understand that the extraordinary level of government spending does no more than retard economic growth, reduce trade, increase the trade deficit, and increase our national debt that will affect the next three generations.

Most people, including those who voted for Obama, understand that the Obama government intends to foist massive taxation upon workers . . . in the form of income taxes and federal excise taxes, and that this will have an even greater deleterious impact on small businesses and unemployment figures. I believe that today, most people are completely fed up with the national socialist party, along with those who claim to be republicans with a moderate socialist point of view, and that all of this was accomplished before Mr. Obama’s 50th day in office.

I believe it can only get worse. I believe this is what happens when you elect morons instead of experiences statesmen.

Ticker said...

"I believe this is what happens when you elect morons instead of experiences statesmen."


Brenda Bowers said...

Everyday the news just keeps getting worse. Every night I tell myself I am not going to turn on this D computer and read about it any more. Every morning I turn on the D computer and let my blood pressure slowly rise thru out the day. BB

Jeff Dreibus said...


It would seem that we have only one option: let's get our hands on the DNA of one of the GOOD presidents and CLONE him!

I'm an independent as you know, so "D" or "R" matters little. I vote for either Ronald Reagan or Harry Truman. Both of them made some missteps, true enough, but they were GIANTS when compared to those mental midgets who have been running the nation of late.

So: who's up for a little grave-robbing?


Jeff Dreibus

Mustang said...

I think Jeff has an excellent idea; the stench couldn't be any worse.

Anonymous said...

Jeff, I agree with you wholeheartedly!! Truman and Reagan were the epitome of true American Presidents.

Old Rose

GM Roper said...

Jeff's idea of a combo reagan/truman rings a chime. Lets see, we can add to that mix Washington, Jefferson and Adams, & Lincoln. Maybe even Ike.

Notice, all of the above would NOT feel comfortable in the Democrat party of today, not even Jefferson or Truman.

Good call!