Monday, March 8, 2010

Dress up Games by Politicans

 

Remember last week when Obama appeared with a group of folks dressed in white lab coats appearing to be doctors?  Well it seems that perhaps that he (Obama) and Kevin Rudd (PM of Australia) are reading from the same script.  It makes it all really laughable when they go to such extremes as trying to dupe folks into thinking that Doctors are backing their ridiculous plans. This week Kevin Rudd appeared wearing a surgical gown and revealed that he is handy with a defibrillator.  He also is known for telling tales of woe when it comes to health care which of course we all know that Obama is a master at doing even though most of his tales have been debunked as pure Barnyard Bovine Excrement.

 
Australia is undergoing a change in health care as they are finding that it is an  expensive proposition but the current administration under Kevin Rudd is determined to continue to take even more of the health care in Australia under government control. 
 
KEVIN Rudd faces growing distrust among premiers over his proposed health funding shake-up, reducing the chance of a negotiated agreement on a federal takeover of public hospitals.
With Western Australia and Victoria already openly hostile to the Prime Minister's plan to seize 30 per cent of state GST revenues to bankroll the move, Queensland hardened its attitude yesterday by linking its co-operation to a major increase in funding for aged-care services.

"In Victoria's case, that would mean close to $1 billion a year extra for our state from the commonwealth," Mr. Brumby(Premier from Victoria) said.
"The reality is, I think as all the independent commentators have observed, the heavy lifting and the extra effort in health in the last decade on health has been done by the states.
"The Prime Minister is probably frustrated. I think he is frustrated that he has announced a major health reform and, to be honest, he hasn't got too many supporters out there." One might add here that Obama has few supporters for his plan as well. According to Rasmussen Reports 65% of the American people do not support his NOCARE plan. It is also noted that down the road that States will be saddled with even more of the cost.


Sounds a bit familiar doesn’t it.  But yet Rudd gives the same reply to those who speak against his plan as Obama does. His most recent reply was, "It's time to get on with it,". Obama keeps saying, “it must be done NOW”. 

Why is it that liberals are so arrogant when it comes to those who oppose their agenda?  I have come to the conclusion that that is all they have--arrogance. They have no real plan that will pass the smell test but are insistent that theirs is the only answer. It is like insisting that even though there may be five hammers in a tool box of all colors and sizes, their red hammer is the only hammer to use be it for nailing a picture hanger to the wall or knocking down a concrete wall. It makes no difference if it is a sledge hammer, at least to liberals it doesn’t.

 
Rudd stated that "In terms of hospitals, beds, doctors, nurses, aged care, dental health, mental health, let me just say this: we now have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to get hospital reform right. Doctors want reform of our hospitals to happen, nurses want it to happen, working families who can't find a place with elective surgery want it to happen." What he forgot to say is that it is going to cost states more and more.  Sounds very familiar since Obama is not telling the American People the true cost of his fiasco.
 
Rudd does tell the truth about elective surgery since it has a long waiting list for such things. There are extensive waiting times for elective surgeries at public hospitals. Although waiting lists for the most urgent elective surgery for heart disease and cancer are almost nonexistent, there are long waiting lists for orthopedic surgery (median wait for total hip replacement is 88 days; 10% of patients waited over 345 days in 1999 to 2000), and cataract surgery (median is 73 days; 10% waited more than 316 days). One of the attractions of health insurance is the ability to bypass public hospital waiting lists. Notice that those with private health insurance are not subjected to the long waits as those who are on government controlled medical treatment. Of course under the Obama fiasco there would be no real thing as private insurance. It would all be controlled by the government.

The cost for health care in Australia is actually less than in the US but then taxes are lower in the US than they are in Australia. Australia spends about 8.5% of gross domestic product while the US spends somewhere in the area of 13.7%. Waiting times for surgery is almost non-existent in the US but is common in countries with Government health control.

 Under Australian Medicare all citizens are covered. There is no limit on fees charged by doctors. There is, however, a government-set fee schedule. Doctors can bill patients or send their bills directly to the government insurance authority, the Health Insurance Commission (HIC). If sent to the HIC, the payment is 85% of the government-set fee for out-of-hospital expenses and 75% of the government set fee for in-hospital services; the money is paid directly to the doctor, and the doctor is not allowed to charge the patient an additional fee. About 75% of family physician services are directly billed to the HIC. If a doctor bills the patient directly, the patient then applies for the rebate of the government set fee. 
Of course this is not true of the Obama fiasco. Fees will be set and will be lower than they are now according to studies done by independent groups and the Senate bill calls for a 20% reduction in fees paid to doctors. Why?  Control is the only reasonable answer that one can offer. Rudd in Australia is seeking a greater control of medical care in Australia and a greater slice of the economy just as Obama and his Democrat minions are seeking to achieve here in the US.

 
Will we learn from Australia and other countries with socialize medicine or will be allow the government even more control over our lives under the Obama NOCARE fiasco?  Mean while the politician like Rudd and Obama carry on their dress up games in attempt to sway the minds of those who lack the ability to see through the game and the snake oil sales pitch.

9 comments:

GM Roper said...

Ticker, it seems that those folk know far better than us poor common undereducated folk what is good for us. It is a bitter pill to swallow while they shove it up our nether regions if you will pardon the mixed metaphor.

Sadly, I suspect that there are a bunch of sheep that will go along with this travesty wanting "the royals" to take care of us all.

Ticker said...

GM unfortunately you are probably correct. Foolish being lead by fools!

Jeff Dreibus said...

I wish to remind everyone that Obama & Co. sit where they now do and bellow "It must be done NOW!" because the Republicans sat on their butts for years with their fingers in their ears and their pockets full of "health" industry loot and oxymoronically shouted "NOTHING is wrong and we're NEVER going to fix it!". That, or "Get a real job!" as ex-Senator Liddy Dole's office once told me. We need your votes, self-employed people, but after the election you can all go hang. Nice.

A "waiting list" for surgery probably sounds pretty good to an American whom Simple Simon Says is ineligible for health coverage, period -- such as is the case with my wife. I, on the other hand, am about to be priced out of the health insurance market altogether. Right now, I pay the health insurance weasels roughly thrice yearly what I pay to the Federal government. If the Federal jackals can offer me a better deal, I'll give it a whirl -- as long “participation” is not made mandatory a la Socialist Security.

You see, some of us are having difficulty distinguishing between which thief is "better" for us. I was a loyal Republican for a long time, and my reward was abject betrayal.

Bash Obamaco all you want -- they deserve it. But please don't try to convince me that the "solution" is to blindly vote in another gang of thieves. What does it really matter whether the government thieves confiscate my money . . . or whether the private sector thieves do the same, then turn around and use it to keep their enablers in power? I see no substantial difference.

Legal theft is theft nonetheless . . . no matter who holds the gun to your head.

Jeff Dreibus

Chuck said...

My first thought when I saw the Obama clip was when he did this last summer and before the shoot they passed out white coats to all of the docs.

These people are simply incapable of seeing the flaw in socialized medicine.

My brother is a huge fan of government funded health care. I asked him if he could name one country in Europe that has success at theirs. He said Britain's works well. I told him he needs to read some British newspapers instead of watching American media.

Anonymous said...

Imagine that ... people dressed up like doctors. Would that be like other people dressed up as President, Speaker of the House, and Senate Majority Leader?

I wish to disagree with my esteemed friend Roper, though. These people are not "royals." I would say they are closer to petty mafia punks. Where is Inspector Callahan when you need him?

Mustang Sends

Ticker said...

Jeff, Republicans have rejected National Health care since before the days of Truman. It has nothing to do with "pockets full of health industry loot". It has to do with personal freedom vs socialism (government control).

The sooner we get government interference out of health care the sooner it will be affordable and therefore unnecessary to have government run (ruined) health care.

Ticker said...

Yep, Mustang that would be the same. Those folks are all dressed up playing a role which they have no clue as how to perform. They play the roles because of their ego's. They are divorced from reality, especially Obama who has always lived in his own little world where reality was not a pleasant option for him. Rejected by his birth father, his mother and even his own grandparents in may ways he created his own little world where he was always right and always won and no one dared to reject him. Now he wants that we all join him in his make believe world.

Ticker said...

Chuck, they see the flaws but as I said to Mustang, their egos will not allow them to admit to the flaws. To them it's all about them and the common man be damned.

Always On Watch said...

Why is it that liberals are so arrogant when it comes to those who oppose their agenda? I have come to the conclusion that that is all they have--arrogance. They have no real plan...

In my experience, most liberals are the most intolerant people I know. They always think that they know best. **spit**

As for waiting for surgery, in my case had I waited any longer for cataract surgery in 1984, when I was but 32 years old, I'd have lost most of the sight in that eye -- permanently.