Sunday Music Gospel Time

William Golden, Baritone for the Oak Ridge Boys is the oldest member of this group . He was a fan when the group split in the early 60's and he recommend himself as a baritone singer.  He got the job. Today they are one of the best known Gospel groups in the US and continue to perform on programs such as the The Gaither 's as well as tour.  Sit back, listen and enjoy as  they perform Life's Railway to Heaven. And Doc Mary, this is especially for you!
Members
Joe Bonsall Duane Allen William Lee Golden Richard Sterban
Past members
Tommy Fairchild Wally Fowler Noel Fox Smitty Gatlin Jim Hammill Herman Harper Gary McSpadden Ron Page Steve Sanders Willie Wynn

Silly Song Saturday

Bet a lot of you can remember this one, well at least a few of you, uh, maybe one or two?

I remember it well from 1956 however I think it received some airtime play later in the 50's.
Perhaps my old friend PJ the DJ can shed some light on the matter.  PJ had the "Tower in the Sky" back in the days. I believe the place , now long gone, was called the BBQ King, located on the Johnson City/Kingsport Hwy(that's in TN folks). Buy a coke or a burger, anything and write your request on the back of the order slip and he would play it.  I can here him now as I cruised in my lil 53 Chevy! 

Those days are gone, but I remember them well!  How about you?

Buchanan & Goodman - The Flying Saucer (Parts 1 & 2)

Part 1: The Platters - The Great Pretender Frankie Lymon & The Teenagers - I Want You To Be My Girl Little Richard - Long Tall Sally Fats Domino - Poor Me Elvis Presley - Heartbreak Hotel The Penguins - Earth Angel Smiley Lewis - I Hear You Knocking Little Richard - Tutti Frutti The Platters - The Magic Touch The Platters - The Great Pretender

Part 2:
Don Cherry - Band Of Gold
Fats Domino - Ain't That A Shame
Don Cherry - Band Of Gold
Nappy Brown - Don't Be Angry
Carl Perkins - Blue Suede Shoes
Chuck Berry - Maybellene
Bill Haley & His Comets - See Ya Later, Alligator
The Platters - My Prayer

Green and Slimy!

Income Redistribution: Of Green Schemes and Shams

 

Paybacks to the Green weenies at taxpayer expense.

Reports have surfaced that tie the Obama administration to a massive green energy stimulus scam by a failed California solar panel manufacturer whose billionaire majority owner happened to be a major fundraiser for the 2008 Obama-Biden campaign. Solyndra Inc. left taxpayers on the hook for $390.5 million by reneging on its promise to create 3,000 construction jobs and 1,000 manufacturing jobs. Instead of creating the president's utopian green manufacturing economy, Solyndra announced Nov. 3 that it planned to postpone expansion, close a plant and lay off workers. According to Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI) and Oversight Subcommittee Chairman Cliff Stearns (R-FL), Solyndra should never have received a stimulus-guaranteed loan of $535 million. You don't say.

The Obama administration's government payback of its own campaign fundraiser's "green" enterprises -- that predictably never turn a profit -- has yet to prompt this administration to make meaningful efforts to stop fraud and waste. The government has no legitimate business trying to fund new industries and unproven startups. Sad how the Obama administration's green energy stimulus schemes continue to be financial calamities for the taxpayers.

Thanks to the Patriot Post

What Part of The Constitution is So Difficult to Understand.

 More arrogance from Obama and the LEFT.

Today Obama decided that he is once again above the law of the land, The Constitution of the United States and shoved aside the oath, which meant nothing to him in the first place, in declaring that  the DOMA law is unconstitutional and ordered his administration to stop defending it at all cost. Of course his butt kissing socialist Attorney General who doesn’t even know that the US Constitution exists from his past actions confirmed that his (not that of the people) office would abdicate it’s responsibility to fight for the Defense of Marriage Act  (DOMA) by abandoning it in the courts. 

 "After careful consideration, including a review of my recommendation... the Department has declined to defend a statute in cases, like this one, where the President has concluded that the statute is unconstitutional... "

Somehow I remember in 8th grade civics that it was up to the SCOTUS and Congress to decide if a law was unconstitutional, not the POTUS and his  Attorney General.
 Hugo Chavez may be able to do such but this is still the United States of America last time I checked even though it is fading fast.

Holder continued to show his arrogance toward the  law by saying”

...he "fully concurs] with the President's determination," has given the order for DOJ attorneys to cease and desist. " The Department has a longstanding practice of defending the constitutionality of duly-enacted statutes," Holder insists, "if reasonable arguments can be made in their defense." The Department does not, however, consider the argument for man-woman marriage—support.

This White House has declared war--not only on marriage--but on Congress, whose authority this President now rejects. It is time for Congress and WE THE PEOPLE to remind him of what is written on that yellowed parchment which gives empowerment to this President is also the one that demands,  

 “He shall take care that the laws be faithfully enforced." And where he fails, Congress must not.

 



How much more disregard of the Constitution will the American People stand for. He interfers in State’s rights , a violation of the X Amendment and now this.

Who will call a halt to this flagrant violation of the Laws of the Land?

Is this another test of what he can get away with to bring forth a "contrived crisis"?  

How long before We The People  take to the streets or have we lost our will?
 

Unrest in the ME and in the US. A Contrived Crisis?

Unrest in the Middle East.  Unrest in ten states, with more to follow, in the US and they seem modeled on the style in Egypt.  Is it a coincidence or is it because one person is behind it all? 

Naw, you say, certainly no one man could create all that unrest.... Oh but yes one man could and has been linked to the unrest in Egypt(and other countries in the ME) and that one man is George Soros.  He has the financial wherewithal to back those willing to create the unrest and has much to gain and little to lose.  By funding the unrest in Egypt he has created a volatile market for oil as we have seen steep price increases since the day one of the unrest.  George Soros is deeply invested in oil and gas businesses and stands to make a fortune just from the current increases.  When the time is right, he sells short, watches the bottom fall out and buys again, thus increasing his fortune. That is but one way and he has knowlege of many ways to profit from the downfall of countries as proven with his profits in the "breaking the Bank of England", The destruction of the Russian Ruble, the manipulation of the Indonesian currency etc.

But why would he want to do such a thing?  George Soros stated that he would being the economy of the US it’s knees.  He  said... “only America stands in the way  of globalist progress and he's going to do everything in his power to bring  America to its knees."

He rejects and reviles most things decent  Americans regard as good and sacred, and he tends to favor everything rotten: He  wants to legalize drugs. He supports euthanasia. He's for socialism and opposes  free-market capitalism. He’s for devaluing America's currency, telling the  Financial Times last year 'an orderly decline of the dollar is actually  desirable.' He supports the destruction of American sovereignty in favor of  global governance.

He has attempted to “buy” elections since 2000 and failed until Obama was elected. Twenty -five million dollars of his own money went into that election plus the hidden money from his hundreds of 527’s and other organizations, too numerous to trace, which do their job, close shop and re-appear under another name with more money and much of it from outside the US.  At this point he is disappointed in his  “Sock Puppet Obama” who has failed to get the Soros inspired agenda off the ground with any success.  He now is going to plan B, unrest, but first it has to be tested before bringing it full force in the US.  He and his organization’s back the Bill which would give Obama power to take over the Internet, shut it down along with any other communication system he sees fit, like conservative talk radio.
They have now seen that it worked in Egypt so now to step two of the plan in the US. Civil unrest, using unions under the guise of “doing what is best for the children” (a favorite slogan of the progressives) and see just how far this act can be pushed before physical violence breaks out. What has happened in other countries in the Middle East when this occurred?  A government crackdown on the protesters has been the reaction. How long before this happens in the US?

Will the contrived crisis be the “shut down of the government” in the coming weeks?

The Left lost power in the November elections and this has once again slowed Soro’s plan via his “Sock Puppet” Obama and somehow this power must be regained. Since it can’t be done at this point through “elections” what better way than civil unrest and a take over by the Leftist government powers.

Will it happen?  That remains to be seen but the fields are ripe for such a harvest.  When will it happen, and yes it will happen?  Sooner than most of us think.  The Progressives can claim that the unrest and desire of “the people” in other countries for “freedom” (their kind of freedom and not the type envisioned by our founders), has spread to the US and now the “people” are speaking out against the “unjust treatment of the “working class”.
Arise and Stand in Solidarity was echoed in Nancy Pelosi’s recent rant on the Wisconsin issue. 

“Wisconsin's workers, teachers and public servants must have a seat at the table to fight for a safe workplace,” she said. “I stand in solidarity with the Wisconsin workers fighting for their rights, especially for all the students and young people leading the charge.”  

As I said, the fields are ripe. The harvest may, no change that, will be bloody and it is coming.

Sunday's Music Gospel Time

The Statler Brothers.

Despite the name, only two members are brothers and none have the Statler surname. The band, in fact, named themselves after a brand of facial tissue (they joked that they could have turned out to be the Kleenex)  Brothers Don Reid sang lead. Harold Reid, Don's older brother, sang bass. Phil Balsley sang baritone and Jimmy Fortune sang tenor after replacing original Statler Lew DeWitt in the early 1980s due to the latter's ill health.DeWitt died on August 15, 1990 of heart and kidney disease, complications of Crohn's disease.

They performed many years in Stanton Va for their annual home coming. I was privileged to attend more than a few of these.  Starting with a small crowd in the early 70's it grew to over 140 thousand in attendance at their last homecoming. I was there and the music was the best I had heard then do in years.  I will always remember that event. 

 Despite all their fame they were ever and always humble, fun loving and most of all great musicians.






And GM, this is for you my friend for you fully understand that He Is There. 
 

Silly Song Saturday

T


They just don't get much better than Ray Stevens when it comes to Silly Songs.

The Streak is certainly one of the best and the video makes it even better. Enjoy Silly Song Saturday.

Yep, It Get's Dumb and Dumber.

Dumb and dumber ways thought up to balance the budget and cut the deficit.

"The administration would have us believe that its enormous deficits are the new base line and that as long as we keep deficits at, say, $1 trillion, we are moving toward balancing the budget.

You don't make progress toward balancing the budget by deliberately jacking up federal discretionary spending to unprecedented levels and then locking in those unsustainable figures with a spending freeze.

You don't decrease deficits by first increasing them, and you can never make headway on reducing the national debt until you eliminate deficits altogether.

Uh, but Obama does! 

Obama said America needs more passenger trains.Subsidized trains cost so much per commuter that it would be cheaper to buy them taxi rides.

But don't tell Obama and Biden that.

"Just like every family in America, the federal government has to do two things at once: It has to live within its means while still investing in the future. If your family [is] trying to cut back, you might skip going out to dinner, you might put off a vacation, but you wouldn't want to sacrifice saving for your kids' college education or making key repairs in your house. So you cut back on what you can't afford to focus on what you can't do without, and that's what we've done with this year's budget." --Barack Obama

No comment necessary on that one! Make up your own.

What we're cutting here is not just waste, we have to actually cut some muscle. ... [Republicans] believe that we cannot afford these investments at this moment, and we believe we cannot afford not to invest at this moment." --Joe Biden using the trick word "investments" to describe outrageous federal spending

Cut your tongue out Joe and save us from your stupooid remarks.

"On Friday, House Republicans unveiled their proposal for immediate cuts in federal spending. Uncharacteristically, they failed to accompany the release with a catchy slogan. So I'd like to propose one: Eat the Future." --New York Times columnist Paul Krugman

And we know how much Krugman knows about anything.

"The House leadership is clearly out of touch with the American people, as they are continuing to focus on legislation that takes away health care women currently have instead of focusing on jobs and the economy." --Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richard

But then Cecile doesn't care about balancing the budget as long as her organization can be pimps for teenage "Ho's  and operate Murder INC on the taxpayer's dime.

Christianity , What is the role?

I have had this in my archives since December of last year and feel perhaps with all the discussion of who is running in 2012 it could be of interest. Who stands for this?  Is it important for any candidate to take such a stand?   Important questions IMO and the article certainly describes not only what has happened in Australia but in the United States.  Can we ignore the facts that Christianity is being ignored while Islam is being promoted? What is the role?

Christianity has role in learning

• David Daintree
• From: The Australian

THE draft national curriculum for history opened an exciting prospect.

Here was a chance, I thought, to defend the honour of Christianity amid the cut and thrust of educational theory, pitting myself against the intricate arguments of those who would deny, or at least downplay, the greatness of the influence of Christianity in the unravelling of the great events of the ages.
Yet the compilers of the draft curriculum have chosen the simplest strategy of all: deliberate, pointed, tendentious and outrageous silence. In its 20 pages, the draft ancient history curriculum mentions religion twice. There is no reference to Christianity anywhere in the document.

The draft modern history curriculum is 30 pages long. Christianity is simply never mentioned, at least not explicitly. The word religion appears twice, the first occurrence in the context of Indian history, the second in the context of Asian and African decolonisation. However the precise phrase in which it is found discloses the agenda of the compilers: "The effect of racism, religion and European cultures."

This, surely, is an oblique mention of Christianity and a judgment upon it at the same time.

The English philosopher Roger Scruton took the word oikophobia and gave it a new meaning.
Oikophobia literally means fear of one's own home, but Scruton nicely adapted it to mean "the repudiation of inheritance and home", the contemptuous rejection of everything that one's parents and grandparents respected, fed by the vanity of a new and supposedly enlightened way of looking at the world.

The name of Christianity is particularly odious to those oikophobes for whom the hope of a multinational and God-free world stands in the place of the dream of a promised land. For such people Christianity has brought more misery than relief, more gloom than joy, more war than peace, more hatred than love.

And - let us be honest - they can produce evidence to support all those opinions.
They can point to the massacres of the Crusades, the use of torture and connivance at capital punishment by the Inquisition, the ruthless eradication of the Albigensians, the Thirty Years War, apparent indifference (in some places) to slavery, the treatment of the Jews throughout European history, the fighting in Northern Ireland, the brutish behaviour of certain clergy towards children.

But against that - if they are honest - they will have to acknowledge that all the evil deeds done by men professing themselves Christian have been counterbalanced by all the good things that have been done in the name of Christ.

The systematic care of the poor, the relief of prisoners, the establishment of hospitals, schools and universities, the self-sacrificing saintliness of many clergy, active resistance to the bullying of civil authorities, the amelioration and ultimately the prohibition of slavery, and the improvement of the lot of women (yes, that too) . . . all these things have emerged within a society that has been predominantly Christian.

Even today, in the shadow land of the post-Christian era, there are many who insist on calling themselves Christians still who have abandoned the faith but maintain a firm commitment to what they rightly regard as the "Christian ethic".
Yet the draft curriculum in history avoids all of this. It is almost completely silent on the whole matter of Christianity. It chooses to ignore a worldwide religious movement that has marched with civilisation for 2000 years, infusing it with a morality that has shaped the thinking of the whole of society, including the minds of those who lost the faith but clung to the moral view.

This omission is not just careless, it is staggeringly inept and profoundly dishonest.
What would an honest and inclusive curriculum look like?

It would recognise the enormous influence of religion in the world since late antiquity.
Moreover, being an Australian curriculum, intended for students in Australian schools, it would not pretend to the possibly laudable but utterly impossible task of giving all the world's cultures and religions equal coverage, but will acknowledge that, like it or loathe it, Christianity has been the dominant faith and moral mentor for our nation since white settlement began, that many indigenous people have embraced it too, and that the more recent waves of settlers - including Muslims and Hindus - have scarcely been unaffected by it. It would be good to see our society honestly facing up to the implications of its own heritage, and mature enough to recognise the good alongside the bad, and wise enough to see that amid the imperfections of any human organisation there is much to take pride in.
For believers, though, the reality is that the incarnation of Christ was and is the greatest event in human history, and that this greatness is not simply a matter of degree, but it is a kind of an absolute and ultimate truth by which alone the significance of all other events must be judged.

Many unbelievers cannot but be angered by such assurance, and we should not be surprised or disappointed by a savage response to such claims.
Many of those most bitterly opposed to Christianity have perhaps sensed that we are on the ropes, utterly nonplussed by this apathy, and are determined to continue to wage that kind of war of attrition in the hope that we shall simply and finally melt away. My suspicion is that some of the framers of the curriculum are driven by such a plan, perhaps consciously, perhaps by instinct.

Many other people of goodwill, non or anti-Christian in their orientation, are willing enough to face us on the field of debate and controversy. Such people may indeed admire and respect aspects of Christianity, while rejecting all or most of its metaphysical tenets.
In many such men and women I think I can see - excuse the presumption - the characteristics of the unconverted St Augustine: all too often they bark against a faith they have not troubled (or have not been able, through the scandal of our failings and our own poor example) to understand.

Clearly it is the best interest of the Christian religion boldly and confidently to face the challenge of those who would with equal confidence contest the veracity and integrity of our claims.

To take the battle vigorously to the critic's gates, to emerge thus from the slough of indifference that now threatens to swallow us, is our best hope.


David Daintree is president of Campion College Australia. This is an edited version of an essay piece appearing in the forthcoming The National Curriculum: A Critique, published by the Institute of Public Affairs and Mannkal Economic Education Foundation.

Fitting Acronym's

You just have to love it when acronym's are so fitting. Here are some very fitting ones from the Obama administration.  Start the week with a good laugh!


During his State of the Union address, Barack Obama debuted a key phrase for his administration's plans this year: "Win the future." As the pop-culturally savvy know, this phrase reduces to the rather unfortunate acronym "WTF." Since this is a family journal we won't spell it out, but it's actually shorthand for a fitting reaction to most of the administration's actions.

Enter Joe Biden, he of "BFD" fame, to straighten things out. Announcing the aforementioned $53 billion rail system, Joe the Gaffer used the phrase "seize the future." This time, the unfortunate acronym is STFU. Of course, that's what Obama has been trying to tell Biden since day one.

Hat tip to the Patriot Post.

Sunday's Gospel Music Time

 TENNESSEE ERNIE FORD - TAKE MY HAND, PRECIOUS LORD

An Icon for certain and a great voice. Had the pleasure of meeting him and hearing him sing on several occasions.  A more humble person , you probably have never met.  Enjoy the music.

And I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; neither shall anyone snatch them out of My hand.  My Father, who has given them to Me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of My Father’s hand.  I and My Father are one.” John 10:28-30 (New King James Version)

Silly Song Saturday

Who Put The Bomp - Barry Mann

Is this perhaps one of the songs that maybe you don't want to know the answer to?

This was a big hit in 1961!  Where were you and what were you doing?

They sure don't write lyrics like this anymore, WOW!

He's In, He's Out or Is He? /This is a TEST

Murbarak  did not step down, and then he did, handing power to the military. The question now turns to how the military, long Egypt's most powerful institution and now its official ruler, will handle the transition in power since they backed Murbarak.  Is Murbarak still running things from the sidelines?  Only he and the military know for sure.
 Of course the inept Obama administration and it's lack of knowing what is going on in situations such as this is not surprising. The flake at the CIA  and the head of intelligence should have known long before the speech what was going to occur but again, ineptness ruled.
Obama , on the campaign trail as usual, and demanded change". Well we here in the US see what "youth" and their lack of intelligence and or knowledge have achieved in the way of change.  

Obama and his inept minions claim a desire for "smooth transition" but by their taking sides and placing Murbarak in a no win situation have done nothing to insure smooth transition.  Even the Saudi’s told Obama to back off and leave Egypt to Egypt. Of course the  “narcissist in chief” knows better and will do what fuels his ego and that is to appear to be the one who knows best for the entire world.  He has  failed to understand , “hey , I won, get over it” doesn't last forever except in his own mind.

Time for the inept Obama to SHUT UP along with the rest of those who seem to think they know what is best for a sovereign country to do. Let Egypt take care of Egypt.

Now we have a volatile situation, the army is in charge with no guarantees that anything will actually change other than Murbarak is no longer in Cairo. The protesters have not gone from the square and many vow to stay until the "change" they want occurs.   More so than yesterday or the weeks before it appears that more of the politicians in DC know more about what is good for Egypt than the Egyptians.

Oil prices rose immediately!  Wonder if Obama and his minions along with this puppet master Soros are rejoicing?
Of course they are and this too is another contrived crisis brought about by those who would destroy this country.  How is this going to Obama and his puppet masters plan?  Will it bring the economy to a halt and then suddenly the “hero” will speak the magic words and it will end, insuring him of the adoration of the sheeples who have no clue as to the manipulations going on behind the scenes by “Hedge funders” like Soros?  Some ask, Did Soros have anything to do with the unrest. Many think as I, he did. Read it here and here.

Wonder how he and his puppet master are viewing the “fluid situation”?  Is the test going the way they thought it would go? Yes, I called it a test because I believe that this is exactly what it was, a test for future “crisis” in this country.

The test of “pulling the switch on the Internet” could certainly be viable. Remember the  “ Internet Kill Switch Bill” is up for a vote in Congress soon.  Did it go the way Obama and his puppet master and minions perceived it to go?

Did the unrest which created the “perceived food shortages” go according to plan?  If there were actual shortages then how have thousands managed to live without food in the square now for weeks?  Was the protest used to block food from the rest of the population in the city to bring about a contrived crisis and further unrest?  How would that work in the US under such a contrived crisis?  Was the watchful eye on this “fluid situation” taking it all in?

How will the military react now?  Now there is a question for Obama and his minions to consider . I am sure they are watching with great anticipation to this “fluid situation”.  How would the Military in the US react? I am sure that could be a troubling question for the “Won”.  Of course putting into place and keeping in place those who  evidently share his beliefs that the military needs to be cut drastically and will go to any lengths to destroy it should come as no surprise and should raise the red flags to those who believe in a strong military to defend the Constitution of this country.

As they say on TV folks,  THIS IS A TEST!  And yes IMO this has been a test. Look for the next “contrived crisis” to occur before 2012 elections.  Be ready for the test, read the warning signs that will be forthcoming in the next months.  The next announcement will not be a TEST. It will be the real thing.

Patriot Act Vote Bad? Maybe Not!

Just perhaps the folks in Congress who voted to end the Patriot know something that we don’t but should. Did Someone actually read the Bills before the vote for a change? 

I was reading the Cyber Security and American Cyber Competitiveness Act of 2011 aka know as the Internet Kill Switch Law and discussion thereon while preparing to do a blog on Egypt and what we should be learning from the situation and ran across an interesting comment.

 "The government can compel companies that own or operate critical infrastructure systems to take those undefined actions for 30-day periods that may be renewed indefinitely. While the bill makes it clear that it does not authorize electronic surveillance beyond that authorized in current law, we are concerned that the emergency actions that could be compelled could include shutting down or limiting Internet communications that might be carried over covered critical infrastructure systems,"  

Please note the language highlighted...”While the bill makes it clear that it does not authorize electronic surveillance beyond that authorized in current law...”

The current law that this is referring to is the Patriot Act.  What does the Patriot act authorize? Electronic surveillance!

 Examples:Roving wiretaps that permit surveillance on multiple phones; Section 215, the so-called library records provision that gives the FBI court-approved access to "any tangible thing" relevant to a terrorism investigation; "lone-wolf" provision of a 2004 anti-terror law that permits secret intelligence surveillance of non-U.S. people not known to be affiliated with a specific terrorist organization.

By killing those parts of the Patriot Act it makes the current “ Internet Kill Switch Bill” before Congress and desperately wanted by the Left and by Obama, pretty much toothless. So just maybe someone in Congress or a group of folks in Congress among the newly elected had done some homework by actually reading the Bill and took some preemptive action. I’m willing to give them the benefit of the doubt for the time being, at least until I can be convinced otherwise.     

Could It Have Been Worse?

2011 Super Bowl XLV Halftime Show

Could anything have been worse?


Were the outfits wardrobe rejects from Star Wars or Star Trek?


And the cast of a thousand aliens? What planet were they from?


Any better suggestions than next year just eliminate half time?

Sunday's Gospel Music Time

George Beverly Shea

The Wonder Of It All - George Beverly Shea

He turned 102 years of age this past week. He is still singing! Indeed, The Wonder of It All.

Do you have a favorite gospel song or singer?

Silly Song Saturday

      Sheb Wooley - Purple People Eater (1958)

         It's Silly Song Saturday! What are your favorite "Silly Songs"?

Stop Global Warming!! Ridiculous?

And yes it does get more ridiculous!!

 Be assured that the Obama EPA is working on a similar (out)law to be put into effect ASAP.


"Breaking wind is set to be made a crime in an African country," the US reports the UK Daily Mail "The EPA government of Malawi plan to punish persistent offenders 'who foul the air' in a bid to 'mould responsible and disciplined citizens.'" Of course, locals worry that the blame game will sniff out the wrong "criminal." One citizen Malawian lamented, "My goodness. What happens in a public place where a group is gathered? Do they lock up half a minibus?" 

Environmentalists have alleged that cow flatulence contributes to global warming, but implicating humans is sure to cause an even bigger stink. The problem is, when passing gas is outlawed, only outlaws will pass gas. 

Now just how ridiculous is that?

Simon & Garfunkel - Sound of Silence With Lyrics

l

Verse 4 of the Sound of Silence speaks volumes:

"Fools", said I, "You do not know
Silence like a cancer grows
Hear my words that I might teach you
Take my arms that I might reach you"
But my words, like silent raindrops fell
And echoed
In the wells of silence

How long will people remain silent? How long before they give a voice to the voiceless?

 President of PP,  Cecile Richards accuses pro-lifers of being "dishonest" and "dangerous." But what is truly dangerous is covering up child sex abuse. It's making a secret deal to hide the abortions of 14-year-old girls.

This Is MURDER INC. and It's Not the Mob.

I posted a blog called Wisdom A very good slant on how one doctor dealt with a woman who was seeking an abortion because she was pregnant “again too soon”.  It reminded me of Solomon  and his dealing with the two women fighting over a child. What actually surprised me was the lack of response from those who supposedly take a stand against abortion. It was pitiful.  Asking for a response was to me like asking the readers to stand up and be counted, something that few are doing these days on issues such as this.

Just in recent days there was news of a Doctor, if one can call him such, Dr. Kermit Gosnell, who had for years been performing abortions in a predominately Black neighborhood. Interestingly enough, the so called Doctor is also black.

It seems that this man performed abortions as late as the eight month of pregnancy. That is not abortion that is MURDER pure and simple as is all abortion in my opinion. However he had been doing such for years according to authorities in Pennsylvania without anyone seeking to stop him. According to reports a number of women had died at the hands of this butcher and yet no one said anything.

Again the question that most thinking people should be asking is WHY has murder been allowed to occur and to go on and on. Could it be that those murdered, the innocent, had/have no voice.  Only until a woman died at the hands of this butcher and someone noticed and complained has anything been done to stop him.   A sad state of affairs indeed.

Now, is it surprising that such goes on in this country?  No, not really since this country has elected the most genocidal President this country has ever had.

Genocidal?  Many will gasp and say surely not and many will call me a liar but it is very much the truth.  I posted a blog on this very subject on January 26, 2009 and the title was Obama-The Genocidal President

In that post I offered as evidence that he was/is a supporter of this genocide or Ethnic Cleansing if you wish, the facts that although African-Americans represent only 12 percent of the American population, they account for almost 35 percent of all abortions. In Mississippi, for example, while African-Americans represent only 37 percent of the population, they account for 73 percent of the state's abortions. More than 78 percent of Planned Parenthood's abortion centers are in or near minority communities.

Secondly, the abortion industry's focus on African-Americans that began in 1939 with Margaret Sanger's involvement with the Negro Project. Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, supported the project's mission of promoting sterilization and birth control among African-Americans because she believed that "the procreation of this group should be stopped."
One of the biggest supporters of this President is Planned Parenthood or MURDER INC as it should be called since there is little planning directed at parenthood involved in their clinics.

If anything similar to the occurrence in Pennsylvania or the planned actions of Planned Parenthood in the elimination of a particular race were to occur in Sudan we would hear screams from the LEFT of GENOCIDE-- but yet they elected an individual with a record of voting for late term abortions and through his actions has extended this genocide to the rest of the world by his executive order undoing what former President Bush had accomplished by stopping funding for abortion in foreign countries. This President continues his support and push for funding of MURDER INC , aka Planned Parenthood , to the tune of over $369 million TAXPAYER  dollars, but yet the sounds of silence are deafening.

Martin Luther King called infant killing evil.  Barack Obama calls it “a woman's right.”  Martin Luther King made his observation from a jail cell, having been put there for defending the civil rights of those whom had been denied theirs.  Barack Obama has made his from caucusing with those who profit from the destruction of babies in the womb.  These are men and women who ignore the silent screams of a lost generation.  Is it any wonder that I refer to Barack Obama as The Genocidal President?

When I challenged Black Pastors such as TD Jakes, in Dallas Texas to take a stand against Obama because he was a supporter of Black Genocide I was met with contempt from his associate Pastors and silence from him. He chose the “thirty pieces of silver” proffered by his congregants over giving a voice to those who have none. Today from the same Black community and Black leaders there is nothing but silence.

Those without a voice still have no voice except from those of us who will dare to take a stand.

Where do you stand?